Rainn Wilson, Louis C.K., and the Problem of the “Rape Joke”
Rainn Wilson, Louis C.K., and the Problem of the “Rape Joke”
Before we debate the issue of jokes about rape and whether or not they can ever be funny, there’s one thing on which we should all be able to agree: Rainn Wilson is a shit. This we base not just on his own rape jokes — this week, it was “If I were ever date-raped I would want it to be to ‘Whole Lotta Love’ by Led Zeppelin” — but the “apology” he later let ooze out onto his Twitter feed: “apparently my poorly conceived date-rape tweet upset a lot of folks. not a good topic to joke about. sorry and won't do that again.” You couldn’t construct a more classic, cowardly non-apology, from the distancing, disbelieving reference to the “folks” “apparently” offended by his joke to the limp little “sorry” tacked on at the end. He should’ve gotten a surly teenager to mutter it for him.
This was our first reaction to Tricia Romano’s Daily Beast article on the “rape joke,” which seems more prevalent than ever. The main problem, as we recently quoted Vulture writer Margaret Lyons as saying, is that the jokes “are by and large just shorthand for outrageousness, a go-to vocabulary to create a patina of audacity without actually saying anything important, or even funny.” (Romano references the same Vulture piece.) Jokes like these — like Rainn Wilson’s — actually exploit victims of rape. What’s clear is that no rape joke, written or said by a man or a woman, should go unremarked. (And by the way, if you’re uncomfortable hearing — or making — such a joke in conversation, you should probably hold your sitcoms to a similar standard.) But, Romano’s piece suggests, not every one of them requires an apology. In fact, they might not only be funny, but also reflect a certain empowerment of women:
[New Yorker critic Emily Nussbaum] says that the prevalence of rape jokes is in part linked to the rise of women’s presence behind the scenes in comedy. The more women there are writing the jokes, the more we’ll see “subjects that are super-central to women and cause anxiety,” she says …
For [Jill Soloway, a television writer], writing a rape joke is about seizing power from a situation that makes women feel powerless. “I think not allowing women to joke about rape is like not allowing people to process and let off steam about one of the main fears of our lives. From the moment we find out what rape is, we're scared it's going to happen to us,” she writes.
Romano also asked the opinion of activist and rape survivor Marnie Goodfriend, who vehemently disagrees:
“People seem to feel comfortable making fun of rape and date-rape and acquaintance-rape situations. And those are the rapes that are largely underreported. And one of the reasons why [they are underreported] is because of pop culture, our society, and myths about rape that if you report a crime, no one is going to believe you — victim blaming. And if you are watching a TV show, or you see a tweet about rape, it just morphs into some type of slang …
I think it's an easy way to mask a much larger issue. The reality is that one in six women will be raped in their lifetime. Some people use humor in the worst situations. That's the only way I can rationalize why woman writers would use rape as a punchline. Because they have the power to change the cycle.”
But what exactly constitutes a rape joke? Romano references a Louis C.K. bit (which you can, and should, watch below) that is hilarious — but that we’re not sure even meets the definition. It’s about the comic’s shock at having a woman tell him she wished he’d been more aggressive with her, to simulate, in his interpretation, rape. That joke is about sex, gender, and communication. Insofar as it is about rape, it is about the line that separates it from sex. And that is clear enough: Rape is, without question, a form of violence. Rape jokes, though, can express all kinds of intent — and even if the intent is good, that doesn’t guarantee that the joke is funny.


Comments
I should have made it clearer, really, but the part of the clip I had in mind was the bit where he says that the only time that it's okay to rape someone is if you want to have sex with them and they won't let you. I do agree with you though - besides being funny, that bit at least acknowledges that rape is a terrible, unjustifiable act, and that's why it works. Wilson's tweet doesn't really broach that, and on the whole I think that joke is a pretty merit-less take on something so serious.
I do genuinely feel, however, that there's something to be said for the acceptance of a certain amount of bad taste and the new ground it allows comics to cover. If there's no room for error (and Wilson's tweet almost certainly is an error) then there won't be much room for success either - and I'd prefer to take a world full of dangerous jokes with the propensity to cause offense than one full of safe, vanilla one-liners.
I feel like this particular joke in this clip from Shameless is the more pertinent CK rape joke ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=wu9q4sM1vmc#t=50s ). On paper it is far less defensible, yet hilarious and entirely kosher to anyone with any kind of rationality and sense of humor. CK himself has stated that he doesn't quite know why that joke is OK to tell.
Obviously no one is going to decry Louis CK - it's commonly held that he's some kind of comic genius, and rightly so - but what exactly is the line that's being crossed that makes his joke fine and Rainn Wilson's cause to call him a shit? Is it because CK's is just funnier? Jill Solaway is quoted in that article, maybe jokingly, maybe not, as saying that "Only women, and men that we decide [can make rape jokes]. It's like the Supreme Court and porn, only we know when it's funny or not funny and we'll tell you.” Defining a subject as out of bounds to 50% of the population unless it passes some sort of Solaway comedy test only serves to limit expression and debate about a serious subject that SHOULD to be discussed. Who can be 100% sure that a joke they're going to make is going to be hilarious? If the fallout from a mediocre joke about a difficult subject is one hundred whiny articles from one hundred whiny media blogs then who is going to even bother to broach the difficult issues?