Robbed: Foo Fighters, Bon Iver (Kind of) Protest the Grammys
Robbed: Foo Fighters, Bon Iver (Kind of) Protest the Grammys
Who will speak for the white men? If you’ve opted for the waterboarding by watercooler that is the online chatter about last night’s Grammy awards, you gather that Whitney Houston was properly honored (or not), Adele is fine (or just okay), and that Chris Brown “ended his performance by back-flipping off the stage, though sadly not off the earth.” (Also: Nicki Minaj.) But what did you learn about the night’s second biggest winners, the Foo Fighters? Or Best New artist Bon Iver? It’s not an injustice, of course, that these white folks commanded as little space in the massive outpouring of quickie Grammy takes as they did; the Foo Fighters are profoundly dull, and Bon Iver’s Justin Vernon, well, you’re either already sick of hearing about him or have no idea who he is. (Life as Kanye West’s token indie-rock collaborater will polarize one’s image this way.)
But the Grammys, as widely watched as they are widely dismissed, exist to turn all notions of the inane and the crucial topsy-turvy, so it is in that spirit that we give the white men our ear. And tweak theirs. Vernon and Foo Fighters frontman Dave Grohl decided to make statements in their acceptance speeches, and both of them amounted to, Hey, we’re better than everybody else. Vernon’s routine might have been the only one smarmier than Grohl’s. This guy — whose music we like — stood up and playacted the awkwardness he thought we should all feel over how out-of-place a person as sincere and focused on his music as he must seem on this bullshit carnival stage of lizards masquerading as human musicians. And then he thanked the voters (“Sweet hook-up”). This was so passive-aggressive some people took it for humility. It’s the white bro’s burden, we guess, to accept the award even though you’re down both with Kanye (whose last disc was not up for Best Album) and a bunch of obscure indie rockers who tragically go unrecognized by the Grammy-givers.
Dave Grohl, an appealing personality from his days as Nirvana’s drummer, devoted his speech to the music, man. The Foo Fighters recorded their latest album, which is bland and featureless as tube socks, in Grohl’s garage — or so goes the story that Grohl has been telling since he started giving interviews about planning the album — without the use of “computers” (but enlisting the expertise of famous producer Butch Vig). Never mind that you’d never know this listening to the album. Computers would surely uncover deviations from standard studio sound recordings. What matters is that Grohl pointed to both his heart and his brain, and told us that the album came from these two places. He said this with such passion that a wire and some sparks actually popped out from behind his left ear.
But honestly, it’s almost as if Dave Grohl is paranoid that his own ability to churn out popular no-hyphens rock means he’s some sort of a robot. It’s just sad to see someone so desperately selling their own authenticity, and in doing projecting their shortcomings on virtually everyone else making popular music — the ones using the computers. Bon Iver, meanwhile, is semi-famous in part for using Autotune. And he still writes from his heart, or, at least, about it. As for his brain matter, we all know how much of that is required to dismiss something as “awkward.”
Foo Fighters win:
Bon Iver win:


Comments
Yuck. Worst article I've read in a while. Nothing but nilly-milly, narcissistic observations from, at best, an envious individual, who was careful about hiding his/her identity as the author of this 6th grade article - absolutely not one sound observation, not to mention stacked and wordy sentences that must be read at least 5 times before having even the faintest idea of what kind of message the author is trying to convey. Why don't you go and give a poor review to a good movie or something?
I think your forgetting that Grohl isn't an artist he's not going to word his points properly, This point has been made by quite a few musicians and though not everyone can understand this it is a very important thing to musicians particularly those who have been in punk or alternative bands. (if I'm honest I can't tell on that record excluding White Limo if it was done in a garage.)He is just trying to spread the word to people who'd be otherwise oblivious to this mind set. If you want to argue with this mind set try doing it with Henry Rollins.
Don't bother speaking for this white man, Nick. You are so pitifully off base on this you're not even in the same zip code as the ballpark. Wasting Light was 'bland and featureless.' Yeah, and this was a well-written, review (wait, no dateline means you were watching this on your couch). So thousands of ticket-buying fans around the country (and world, they sold out shows in Europe and Australia, too) are wrong and you, Mr. Watching the Grammy telecast from My Couch, are right. A band continues to produce new music, tour countless countries, play sold-out venues for 16 years, but everyone who supports that endeavor is wrong. Guess I better toss all my Foo Fighters music and have the part of my brain that remembers their work removed. Nick says so. He's right. The rest of us are wrong. My only regret in writing this is that it gives you one (1) comment on your misguided, uninformed critique. When you go on tour this year, will you come to California? Oh wait, you're a critic (or something). You don't go on tour, or create music, or move people and make them want to buy your work. You criticize. Bravo.
I agree wholeheartedly with your article and commend you for coming forward with a real opinion whether from your couch or recording studio.
Wow, what a crock of sh|t this article is.